Five Ideas: Abercrombie & Fitch, Brown-Forman, Canadian Solar, Kohl's, Sibanye-Stillwater
Post-Earnings Updates and Quick Idea Theses
We highlight five companies that have reported earnings in recent days and might be of interest to value-oriented investors. We focus on businesses where a credible valuation case can be made; we avoid companies where optimism has already pushed the shares to such heights that prospective returns seem likely to disappoint.
An overview:
Abercrombie & Fitch’s multi‑year brand turnaround and net‑cash balance sheet underpin earnings, while management’s buybacks are accretive. At around $100 per share, the stock trades at ~10x this year’s ~$10 EPS and ~4x EV/EBIT on ~$500m FY2025 EBIT, implying a double‑digit FCF yield.
Brown‑Forman’s durable whiskey and tequila franchises merit a premium, yet shares reset to ~16x trailing EPS and ~14x EV/EBITDA (with a ~3% dividend yield), below spirits peers’ high‑teens multiples. This dislocation and a DCF implying ~39% upside (fair value ~$49 vs ~$30) offer a high‑quality asset at a value price.
Canadian Solar is priced like a distressed asset at 0.25x book ($42/share) and ~0.3x sales despite top‑5 global scale and a valuable project pipeline. With a 62–64% stake in Shanghai‑listed CSI Solar (IPO valuation ~$5B) and a sum‑of‑the‑parts well above the ~$670 million market cap — alongside recovery potential to ~8–9x FY2026 EPS — the stock offers a deep discount to net asset value.
Kohl’s is an asset‑rich turnaround trading at roughly 0.5x tangible book (~$34/share) with owned real estate estimated at $7–8 billion and improving margins from inventory discipline and Sephora shop‑in‑shops. As profits normalize from trough levels (potential >20% FCF yield and 6–8x P/E on $2–3 EPS scenarios), the equity has rerating potential relative to its asset base.
Sibanye‑Stillwater offers leveraged exposure to recovering PGM and gold prices at a trough valuation of 0.8x tangible book ($8.50/share) and under 1x revenue. On recovering 2025–26 EBITDA, EV/EBITDA could fall to low single digits (and ~10x forward P/E), creating asymmetric upside from today’s $7–8 share price.
A small number of seats at our event of the year, Latticework 2025, will be made available soon to our Substack subscribers. Stay tuned!
Latticework 2025 will be held in New York City on October 7th. In fireside chats with audience participation, the summit will explore intelligent investing in a rapidly changing world. Keynote speakers include:
Chris Bloomstran, President of Semper Augustus Investments Group
Tom Gayner, CEO of Markel and Director of The Coca-Cola Company
Saurabh Madaan, Managing Member of Manveen Asset Management
Scott Miller, Founder of Greenhaven Road Capital
Bob Robotti, President and CIO of Robotti & Company Advisors
Tom Russo, Managing Member of Gardner Russo & Quinn
Will Thomson, Managing Partner of Massif Capital
Christopher Tsai, President of Tsai Capital Corporation
Ed Wachenheim III, Chairman of Greenhaven Associates
Disclaimer: The content of this article and website is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. The content is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to sell or buy any security or other investment, or undertake any investment strategy. There are no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or results obtained from any information set forth on this website. BeyondProxy’s officers, directors, employees, and/or contributing authors may have positions in and may, from time to time, make purchases or sales of the securities or other investments discussed or evaluated herein.
Let’s find out why the following ideas may be worth a closer look.
Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF)
Structurally improved retailer trading at low multiple of earnings. The stock (~$100 per share) is ~10x this year’s expected ~$10 EPS. The business has been rejuvenated by a multi-year brand turnaround, and management’s shareholder-friendly actions (7% share count reduction YTD via buybacks) demonstrate alignment. Investors have an opportunity to own a debt-free company with net cash and strong brands at a discount.
Q2 results affirm positive momentum. Abercrombie just delivered its 11th consecutive quarter of sales growth. Q2 FY2025 net sales hit a record $1.21 billion (up 7% YoY) and adjusted diluted EPS was $2.32. Management raised full-year guidance to 5–7% revenue growth and ~$10–10.50 EPS. Operating margin is now tracking ~13–13.5%. The company generated $113 million of operating cash flow in the first half, and repurchased $250 million of stock YTD. With $573 million in cash and no borrowings drawn, liquidity nears $1 billion. Management’s upbeat outlook and continued share buybacks underscore confidence in the business.
Strong brand resurgence and sales mix. The Abercrombie brand’s revival and Hollister’s growth (+19% YoY in Q2 net sales) highlight the success of new fashion offerings and marketing. A&F has effectively tapped into its core young adult demographic while expanding into casual and fitness wear. Eleven straight quarters of growth and record sales reflect improved product-market fit and pricing power. Gross margin has expanded (adjusted 13.9% operating margin in Q2 vs 15.5% last year) even as comparable sales rose 3%, indicating healthy full-price sell-through. The company’s omnichannel model (stores plus e-commerce) and global diversification (Americas up 8%, APAC up 12% YoY in Q2) add resilience.
Financial strength enables shareholder returns. Abercrombie is generating significant FCF and deploying it to enhance shareholder value. Year-to-date, it has repurchased 3.2 million shares (~7% of shares) and still has $1.05 billion authorized for buybacks (20+% of market cap). The balance sheet carries no long-term debt, and cash exceeds $600 million. This financial flexibility allows continued investment in stores and digital (capex ~$225 million planned) while returning capital. Management’s disciplined inventory control (inventories modestly up ~10% YoY despite higher sales) and cost focus have preserved margins and cash flow.
Capable leadership driving the turnaround. CEO Fran Horowitz and her team have transformed ANF from a struggling teen retailer into a profitable, trend-responsive apparel company. Management’s focus on product quality and brand positioning has revitalized customer engagement. Management’s guidance raise this quarter suggests confidence in sustaining momentum into the important holiday season.
Key risk – fashion and brand cyclicality. If Abercrombie falters over the next 3–5 years, the likely culprit will be a reversal of brand momentum. The apparel retail sector is notoriously fickle; a miss on fashion trends or a lapse in brand cachet could send sales into decline. The core youth/young-adult demographic is sensitive to shifting tastes and competition. A failure to keep the brands culturally relevant – or a downturn in consumer spending – could pressure sales and margins. While ANF has navigated inventory and sourcing well recently, any execution misstep (e.g. fashion misses leading to heavy discounting) would erode the hard-won margin gains.
At ~$100 per share, ANF trades around 10x current-year earnings, a discount to specialty retail peers. On an FCF basis, the stock offers a double-digit yield when adjusting for normalized capex and working capital. The EV is only ~4x the expected ~$500 million in FY2025 EBIT, after accounting for the net cash position. Continued repurchases at these low multiples are accretive. If Abercrombie hits its ~$10.25 mid-point EPS guidance, the earnings yield (~10%) and improving ROIC profile suggest upside as the market gains confidence in the turnaround.
Resources for further research:
Brown-Forman (BF‑B)
High-quality spirits franchise at uncommon value. Brown-Forman’s share price (~$30 per share) has fallen ~33% in the past year, compressing its valuation to ~16x trailing earnings — unusually modest for a company with iconic brands and decades of steady profitability. This pullback offers long-term investors a chance to own world-class labels like Jack Daniel’s at a steep discount. Brown-Forman’s resilient economics (high margins, pricing power, and a 150+ year history) and shareholder-friendly ethos (41 consecutive years of dividend increases) underscore its quality. With the controlling Brown family prioritizing sustainable growth, the gap to intrinsic worth holds appeals.
Recent results reflect near-term headwinds, but guidance is intact. In fiscal Q1 2026, net sales declined 3% to $924 million amid currency and one-off factors. Adjusted for these, organic sales were roughly flat. Diluted EPS came in at $0.36 (vs $0.41 in the prior-year quarter), missing consensus by a penny and reflecting restructuring charges and softer volumes in certain markets. Management reaffirmed its full-year outlook for low-single-digit declines in organic revenue and operating income. Despite the sales dip, gross margin ticked up to ~59.8% thanks to favorable product mix and pricing. The company’s 41-year dividend growth streak remains unbroken.
Global spirits leadership and pricing power. Brown-Forman owns one of the industry’s strongest brand portfolios, anchored by Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey – a top-selling whiskey worldwide – and augmented by premium bourbons (Woodford Reserve, Old Forester), tequilas (Herradura, el Jimador), and other spirits. This collection of brands forms a durable competitive moat: consumers exhibit strong loyalty, and the company can steadily raise prices (as seen historically) without significant volume loss. Even in FQ1, the Jack Daniel’s family held its value (some softness in core Jack volume was offset by gains in flavored and premium lines). Newer products like ready-to-drink cocktails grew 6% (9% organically), showing the firm’s ability to innovate and meet evolving tastes. With distribution in over 170 countries, Brown-Forman has a long runway for international growth, particularly as rising middle classes in emerging markets acquire a taste for premium spirits. This broad global footprint and brand equity allow the company to maintain high gross margins (near 60%) and consistently earn returns on capital well above its cost of capital.
Proven resiliency through cycles. As a 150-year-old enterprise, Brown-Forman has weathered recessions, wars, and changing consumer fads. Its products have enduring cultural relevance, enabling reliable demand even in downturns. For example, while FQ1 saw volume pressure in some markets, the company’s swift restructuring and marketing adjustments protected profitability. Advertising and SG&A expenses were trimmed by mid-single digits, reflecting management’s agile response to margin headwinds. The firm’s conservative balance sheet (A-rated; ~$470 million cash on hand and moderate debt) and prodigious cash generation provide stability. These financial strengths, combined with a prudent culture, allowed Brown-Forman to continue investing in long-term brand health throughout a challenging FY2025 (when organic sales dipped 3%). Importantly, management’s full-year FY2026 guidance implies that last year’s trough is behind them.
Strategic premiumization and innovation. Management is focused on premiumizing the portfolio, which bodes well for mix and profitability. In recent periods, super-premium brands like Gentleman Jack and Old Forester each notched 8% sales growth, outpacing the broader portfolio. The company is also innovating in fast-growing categories: e.g. expanding its tequila lineup (launching new Herradura and el Jimador variants) and RTD cocktails, and integrating acquisitions (Gin Mare in 2023, a premium gin with 40% sales growth in Q1). These initiatives aim to keep Brown-Forman relevant with new generations of drinkers.
Key risk – shifts in consumer drinking habits. The primary long-range risk is a structural change in alcohol consumption or competitive landscape that erodes Brown-Forman’s brand power. For instance, if younger generations permanently reduce spirits intake or favor craft/local brands over legacy labels, volume growth for Jack Daniel’s and siblings could stagnate. There are also category-specific risks: tequila and whiskey are fashionable now, but tastes can shift (as seen with prior vodka and gin cycles). A related risk is that Brown-Forman might overpay for acquisitions in pursuit of new growth – diluting returns – given pressure to diversify beyond whiskey. Additionally, cost inflation (commodities, glass, logistics) can compress margins if not offset by pricing.
BF-B shares trade around 16x EPS and offer a ~3% dividend yield – an atypically low valuation for this caliber of consumer staples business. Historically, Brown-Forman commanded a premium multiple in the mid-20s due to its stability and brand strength. Now, investor pessimism about near-term growth has left the stock ~39% undervalued by DCF estimates (fair value ~$49 vs market ~$30). Enterprise value is about 4x annual sales, and ~14x EBITDA (vs high-teens averages for spirits peers). The dividend has grown for four decades and consumes a comfortable portion of FCF, suggesting room for continued hikes. Given minimal capex needs and low working capital intensity, Brown-Forman consistently converts earnings to FCF, supporting potential share repurchases (though the family has tended to prefer dividends).
Resources for further research:
Canadian Solar (CSIQ)
Renewable energy leader trading at extreme valuation disconnect. Canadian Solar’s price (around $10 per share) equates to only ~0.25x book value, reflecting deep skepticism. Yet the company holds a global top-5 position in solar module manufacturing and a vast project development pipeline, suggesting intrinsic value well above the current $670 million market cap. Notably, Canadian Solar’s majority-owned manufacturing subsidiary, CSI Solar, completed an IPO in 2023 valuing it around $5 billion – implying the market is assigning little to no value to the rest of the business (the high-margin project development arm). Founder-CEO Dr. Shawn Qu (who owns ~32% of shares) has guided the company through cycles, and his stake aligns management’s interests with shareholders’. For long-term value investors, CSIQ offers a chance to buy net assets (including ~$42 per share in book value) at a substantial discount, with optionality on a sector rebound.
Latest earnings show growth in revenues and margins, but one-time charges weighed on net profit. In Q2 2025, Canadian Solar’s revenues were $1.7 billion, up 4% year-on-year (and +42% sequentially) driven by higher sales of battery storage systems and solar modules. Module shipments reached 7.9 GW for the quarter, near the high end of guidance. Gross margin expanded to 29.8% – well above the 23–25% guidance – thanks to a richer sales mix (more North American modules, robust storage shipments) and one-off benefits like U.S. tariff credits. However, non-recurring operating expenses (including impairments on certain solar/storage assets) led to only a small GAAP net income of $7 million (–$0.08 per share). Operating cash flow turned positive at $189 million in Q2 thanks to inventory reduction. Management did trim full-year revenue guidance to $5.6–6.3 billion (from $6.5+ billion prior) due to some project sales shifting into 2026 and a more cautious view on module pricing.
Vertically integrated model with global scale. Canadian Solar is unique among solar companies in combining a large manufacturing base with a high-value project development arm. Through its CSI Solar division, the company produces modules (targeting ~25–27 GW shipments in 2025, making it one of the world’s largest producers) and has a growing battery storage product line (7–9 GWh of storage shipments expected this year). Meanwhile, its Recurrent Energy division develops solar power plants and battery projects worldwide – a business with lumpy but potentially very high-margin revenue when projects are sold. The group’s project pipeline stands at an impressive ~27 GW of solar and 80 GWh of storage in various stages. This vertical integration provides multiple profit streams: manufacturing benefits from scale and brand (modules shipped to 160+ countries), while project development captures additional value from originating and building assets. It also grants Canadian Solar insight into end-market demand trends, informing its capacity expansion and technology roadmap.
Asset-rich balance sheet and hidden value. Equity is ~$2.8 billion (≈$42 per share), i.e., the stock trades at barely a quarter of book. The company does carry substantial debt ($6.3 billion including project financing and convertible notes), but much of this is tied to self-funded projects that are sold or expected to generate cash flows. As those projects reach completion, debt is repaid or transferred to buyers – meaning book value is likely to convert to tangible cash over time. The successful IPO of CSI Solar on the Shanghai market underscores the parts’ value: CSIQ still owns ~62–64% of that entity, worth roughly $3 billion at the IPO price, which alone is several times the entire current market cap of the parent. Furthermore, the project pipeline has significant embedded value; management noted it has $3 billion in contracted battery storage backlog and regularly monetizes projects at attractive returns. The sum-of-the-parts valuation appears dramatically higher than the market price – a situation that could be corrected through asset sales, a spinoff, or continued profitable growth.
Growth outlook underpinned by global clean energy trends. Despite recent industry volatility, solar demand globally continues to rise (installations hit record levels in 2023–2024). Canadian Solar, with manufacturing in China and expanding capacity in Southeast Asia, benefits from economies of scale and a cost structure in line with top-tier Chinese competitors. It has also been navigating trade restrictions by localizing some production for key markets (e.g. a module plant in the U.S. under consideration). The company’s shift toward more battery storage solutions and residential products opens new revenue streams. Meanwhile, government policies like the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act are providing tailwinds (e.g. incentives for domestic content). In Q2, Canadian Solar’s North America sales were strong, contributing to the margin beat. Longer-term, as countries invest in renewables to meet climate goals, Canadian Solar’s diversified presence (Americas, Asia, Europe) and end-to-end capabilities make it a likely beneficiary. The company expects steady growth in its retained power-producing assets (IPP portfolio) which provides recurring income. Overall, the secular growth narrative for solar and storage remains intact, offering Canadian Solar a path to scale earnings if it can navigate near-term pricing cycles.
Key risk – solar industry cyclicality and financial leverage. The biggest risk to the thesis is the volatile nature of the solar manufacturing business. Periodic gluts of panels can drive prices below cost, as seen recently, leading to thin or negative margins. There’s also policy risk: a significant portion of sales are subject to trade policies (tariffs, import bans) and subsidies. For instance, U.S. trade actions on Chinese panels or changes in subsidy regimes in major markets could hurt demand for Canadian Solar’s products or projects. In a bear case, continued net losses and cash burn might force equity dilution or asset sales at unfavorable prices. Thus, while the stock is statistically cheap, investors must be comfortable with the solar industry’s volatility and CSIQ’s leveraged balance sheet.
The stock trades at ~0.3x trailing sales and well under 1x book, in sharp contrast to peers in the renewable sector or to its own historical multiples. Even considering the thin margins of manufacturing, this pricing is extreme – it suggests the market expects years of poor profitability or a distressed outcome. However, if one assumes a moderate recovery in earnings, the valuation appears compelling. For example, analysts project a strong rebound by 2026 as industry conditions improve, with the stock valued at ~8–9x FY2026 earnings – still cheap for a company that in past upcycles earned over $3 per share. FCF is difficult to gauge due to growth investments, but management has been operating cash-flow positive through working capital management. On a sum-of-parts basis, the 64% stake in CSI Solar (Shanghai-listed) plus the value of the project pipeline and other assets could easily exceed the enterprise value; the market is effectively assigning a large conglomerate discount or doubting value realization.
Resources for further research:
Kohl’s (KSS)
Deep value backed by real assets and a self-help turnaround. Kohl’s shares (mid-$16s) trade at roughly 0.5x tangible book value, indicating heavy market skepticism. Yet the company owns ~400 of its 1,100+ stores, with real estate estimated around $7–8 billion. For value investors, Kohl’s represents a classic asset-rich, out-of-favor retailer that could rerate if management stabilizes performance. The new CEO’s strategy to refocus on value pricing, improve inventory efficiency, and leverage partnerships (like in-store Sephora shops) is starting to bear fruit. Meanwhile, an activist-influenced board is pressing for shareholder value creation.
Q2 earnings beat expectations despite sales declines, and guidance was raised. Kohl’s second quarter FY2025 results showed net sales down 5.1% YoY to $3.35 billion as the company continued to face lower traffic. Comparable sales fell 4.2% – a decline, but not as steep as feared. Kohl’s delivered adjusted EPS of $0.56, handily exceeding the $0.30 consensus estimate. This earnings beat was achieved through higher gross margin (39.9%, up 28 bps YoY) as proprietary brands and inventory management drove fewer markdowns, and through expense reductions (SG&A fell ~$50 million YoY). The quarter’s GAAP net income was boosted by a one-time $129 million legal settlement from credit card fee litigation, resulting in EPS of $1.35; excluding one-offs, results still beat Street forecasts. Management raised its full-year outlook: FY2025 adjusted EPS is now guided at $0.50–$0.80 (up from $0.20–$0.60 prior). While net sales are still expected to decline 5%–6% for the year, the improved profit guidance suggests Kohl’s cost and margin initiatives are yielding gains.
Turnaround strategy focused on value and omnichannel. Kohl’s is repositioning itself as a go-to retailer for value-conscious families. The introduction of Sephora shop-in-shops (now in ~900 stores) has incrementally lifted store traffic and attracted younger, beauty-oriented customers. Digital sales are also a bright spot – the company highlighted strong online growth contributing to the Q2 profit beat, and it continues to invest in its website/app and in-store pickup options. On merchandising, Kohl’s is doubling down on its own private-label brands (which carry higher margins) and rationalizing its product assortment. This helped drive the slight gross margin improvement in Q2 even amid a promotional retail climate. Inventory levels are down (~5% lower YoY), reflecting better alignment with demand and fewer clearance markdowns. Additionally, the company has been managing expenses tightly: it has closed underperforming stores (27 closures planned) and streamlined corporate overhead.
Despite a challenging 2020s retail environment, Kohl’s financial position remains solid. The company ended Q2 with $1.5 billion of long-term debt and a modest $174 million of cash (post refinancing some maturities). Leverage is reasonable, and the company has unutilized credit lines for liquidity. Crucially, Kohl’s owns roughly 35% of its store real estate. These owned properties (land and buildings across many suburban locations) provide an underlying asset floor – analysts have estimated the real estate could be worth on the order of $7 billion in a sale-leaseback. Kohl’s inventory (nearly $3 billion as of Q2) is mostly current and unencumbered. The company resumed its dividend in 2023 (though at a token $0.125 quarterly rate), signaling confidence in cash flow. Looking ahead, as capital expenditures stabilize (~$400 million planned for the year, mainly for store refreshes and IT), Kohl’s could generate positive FCF that can be used for further debt reduction or buybacks. The presence of activists on the board and a substantial short interest (~31% of float short) also suggests that any operational improvements could catalyze outsized equity gains.
Experienced new leadership and shareholder influence. CEO Tom Kingsbury (a veteran retailer who led Burlington Stores) stepped in during 2023 and aggressively moved to fix execution issues. Under his brief tenure, Kohl’s curtailed excessive inventory, cut hundreds of millions in costs, and refocused on the core value proposition. Kingsbury will hand the reins to incoming CEO Tom Buchanan (from Michaels and Walmart) in January 2025, marking the third CEO change since 2018 – a concern, but the transition plan is in place. The board, refreshed after activist pressure in 2022, is keenly focused on performance metrics and evaluating all avenues for value (including potential real estate strategies or separations, if needed).
Key risk – secular decline in mid-tier retail. The biggest risk is that Kohl’s efforts may not be enough to overcome structural headwinds. Department-store and big-box retail has been losing share to e-commerce and off-price channels for years. If Kohl’s cannot stop the slide in sales, even a leaner cost base won’t save its earnings in the long run. A worst-case scenario is a continued annual comp sales decline in the mid-single digits or worse, leading to deleveraging of fixed costs and margin erosion. Competition is intense: discounters like Target and TJ Maxx, as well as Amazon and others online, pressure Kohl’s core categories (apparel, home, beauty).
Kohl’s tangible book value is about $34 per share, meaning the stock trades at less than one-half of book. Even using more conservative measures (e.g. liquidation value of inventory plus real estate at a discount), the asset coverage appears strong relative to the stock price. On an earnings basis, the picture is muddied by depressed profits: the midpoint of new guidance ($0.65 FY25 EPS) puts the stock at ~25x near-term earnings. However, this is during a trough. If Kohl’s can restore even part of its historical profitability (for instance, it earned ~$5 EPS in 2018), the stock would be trading at only ~3x those “normalized” earnings. An intermediate scenario – say, $2–3 EPS in a couple of years with low-single-digit margins – would still render the current price 6–8x earnings, very cheap for a stable retailer. FCF yield is also poised to improve: with leaner inventories and capped capex, Kohl’s could generate hundreds of millions in FCF annually, potentially a >20% FCF yield on the equity.
Resources for further research:
Sibanye-Stillwater (SBSW)
Leading precious metals miner at trough-cycle valuations. Sibanye’s stock (around $7–8) reflects recent losses in its platinum group metals (PGM) business, but the company’s asset portfolio and leverage to recovering metal prices indicate significant intrinsic value. As one of the world’s largest primary producers of platinum and rhodium (and #2 in palladium), Sibanye controls resource assets that would be costly to replicate. It also operates significant gold mines in South Africa and has growing exposure to battery metals (lithium projects in Europe). Commodity prices have begun to rebound in late 2025, and Sibanye’s profits are highly sensitive to such moves. Meanwhile, management (founder CEO Neal Froneman, retiring end of Sept 2025) has a track record of opportunistic M&A and returning cash in good times (Sibanye was once a hefty dividend payer). The stock trades under 0.9x revenue and a fraction of book value, pricing in a bleak scenario. For value investors who can stomach cyclicality and jurisdictional risk, SBSW offers a play on mean reversion in PGM and gold markets, with potential multi-bagger upside if conditions normalize.
H1 2025 results show a turnaround to profitability (before impairments) thanks to higher prices and U.S. tax credits. After a difficult 2024, Sibanye’s first half of 2025 saw improved operating performance. Revenue rose on the back of a 36% jump in realized gold price (in rand terms) and stabilization in PGM operations. Adjusted EBITDA for H1 2025 was R4.8 billion (~$260 million), up 118% YoY. The company’s South African gold mines, despite 13% lower output, generated their highest EBITDA since 2020 due to record gold prices (peaking around $3,500/oz in local currency terms). On the PGM side, Sibanye benefited from the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act’s Section 45X production credits: it recognized $285 million of government credits related to its U.S. palladium and recycling operations. This bolstered first-half earnings and cash flow, effectively offsetting cost pressures. The key takeaway is that operationally, Sibanye’s core segments are improving, and absent the one-offs, the company is back to profitability – a pivotal shift from last year’s deep losses.
World-class resource portfolio with diversified output. Sibanye-Stillwater was built via acquisitions into a diversified mining house. In PGMs, it operates major mines in South Africa (the Marikana and Rustenburg operations acquired from Lonmin and Amplats) and the Stillwater mines in Montana, USA. This makes Sibanye the largest platinum producer and a top palladium producer, supplying metals essential for catalytic converters in autos. These assets have long mine lives and, at higher PGM prices, generate substantial cash. The company is also a top-tier gold miner in South Africa, with mines like Driefontein and Kloof that, while older and challenging, benefit immensely when rand gold prices surge. To hedge against the eventual decline in auto-catalyst demand, Sibanye has moved into battery metals: it acquired the Keliber lithium project in Finland and other lithium and nickel interests. While Keliber’s value was written down due to lower lithium price forecasts, it still represents future upside if EV demand rises.
Cost-cutting and financial resilience through the downturn. Management has taken decisive action to navigate the weak PGM price environment of the past two years. In 2022–2023, Sibanye restructured its SA PGM mines, closing or scaling back high-cost shafts, which reduced the cost base. This is evident in H1 2025 results: “decisive restructuring” was cited as a factor narrowing losses. The company also cut capital expenditure and suspended dividends to conserve cash. As a result, net debt remains manageable. At mid-2025, Sibanye had roughly $540 million net debt (excluding lease liabilities) – a moderate level relative to its EBITDA potential in an upswing. It has also built a cash war chest in better times, and the balance sheet is strong enough to weather further volatility. The decision not to pay an interim dividend in 2025 was prudence aimed at maintaining liquidity until the recovery is more certain. That said, Sibanye has a history of generous payouts (it distributed billions in dividends during 2020–2021 when commodity prices boomed). Shareholders can thus expect that when profitability recovers, the company will resume returns either via dividends or buybacks. Another point of resilience: the weakening of the South African rand to multi-year lows has acted as a buffer for local operations, as revenue (tied to dollar metal prices) outpaces rand-denominated costs – this helped SA gold and PGM margins in H1.
Key risk – commodity prices and South African operating challenges. If PGM prices (especially palladium and platinum) remain depressed or fall further, the company’s PGM division could revert to losses. The long-term outlook for PGMs is uncertain due to the rise of EVs (which use less palladium/platinum in drivetrains). While a near-term cyclical rally is underway, structural demand could erode, potentially stranding some of Sibanye’s higher-cost reserves. Another major risk is the operating environment in South Africa: the company faces labor unions (a three-month gold strike hit in 2022), power supply issues from Eskom (leading to intermittents stoppages), and increasing regulatory and political risk (talk of resource nationalism, high mining royalties, etc.). These factors can impact production volumes and costs. For example, in H1 2025, SA gold output fell 13% due to “operational challenges” – a reminder of inherent difficulties.
~10x FY2024–26 forward earnings based on recovering profit forecasts; looking ahead to 2025–26 consensus EBITDA, EV/EBITDA could fall to low single digits. Tangible book value is about $8.50 per share (including past retained earnings and revaluations); thus P/B is ~0.8x, suggesting the market is valuing the company below the net worth of its mines and plants. It’s notable that in strong metal price environments, Sibanye generated over $2 per share in annual earnings and paid hefty dividends. Even a partial mean reversion (say, platinum returning above $1,100/oz, gold sustaining ~$2,000/oz) could produce EPS well over $1.00. If the P/E on such normalized earnings were, say, 6–8x (still conservative for a leading miner), the stock would trade in the high single to low double digits.
Resources for further research:
Were the above snapshots helpful to you? How could we add more value to your efforts? Reply to let us know — we look forward to hearing from you!
Featured Events
Latticework 2025, The Yale Club of New York City (Oct. 7)
Ideaweek 2026, St. Moritz, Switzerland (Jan. 26-29, 2026)
Best Ideas Omaha 2026, Omaha, Nebraska (May 1, 2026)
The Zurich Project 2026, Zurich, Switzerland (Jun. 2-4, 2026)
Enjoying Latticework? Help us make it even more special.
Share Latticework (simply click the above button!)
Introduce us to a thoughtful speaker or podcast guest
Be considered for an interview or idea presentation
Volunteer to host a small group dinner in your city
Become a sponsor of Latticework / MOI Global
Volunteer by reaching out directly to John (john@moiglobal.com).